As it appears, multiple views are generated with different goals. Just check if following can be the focus categories
- one for learning by SMEs - new techniques, new practices - success and failure experience of others, DOs and DONTs from peers, THOUGHT LEADERS, ANALYSTS, MENTORS
- second for innovative business techniques worth everyone to know- 2-3 examples
-third for getting new business entries into large corporates /thru their CIOs, new countries/govt bodies
- fourth to recognise IT SMEs who managed using differently abled staff
- fifth to recognise IT SMEs who depend on workforce - rural and 2 /3 tier educational background, poor English knowledge/fluency but excellent workplace contribution ...
Networking and business opportunities are rightly deserved, but how many set ups are prepared with quality touchpoints, case for differential, robust arguments to justify their market place. How do we help start ups learn NAVIGATION by learning from PITFALLS suffered by SMEs of 5-10 years experience. How do we help these 5-10 years old energetic SMEs break the barriers of their own first.
Missing the goals every querter/ year for SMEs must make them STIRR OUT, and look OUT OF THE BOX, using Nasscom EMERGE. It is a great chance for those handicapped and suffering. That is where biggest ROI lies for members and non members who participate.
Extending current success formula by accessing CIOs etc are no less important, but that should be fairly easy if we have built a CREDIBLE STORY otherwise.
Publicity in coming weeks may highlight to sell the points
- how you can increase drastically topline and bottomline by benchmarking your existing offerings/sustainable market position
- how differently abled workforce and from rural and tier 2-3 institutions can do magic for your organization by far dependable work commitments